The Crud Factory
Free Rubbish for Free
Minds.
Contents.
E-books in PDF format.
These books may be downloaded and read for free.
‘Quantum’ physics without silliness.
The majority of quantum physicists claim there exists a
mysterious kind of action at a distance, between objects linked
to each other by a kind of magic called ‘entanglement’. This
claim is certainly false, because it leads to logical
contradictions when combined with the totality of human
knowledge. (For instance, siblings could not have similar DNA
unless born with ‘entangled’ DNA, which of course they are not.)
The correlations do exist but are simply ordinary correlations,
such as one encounters throughout causation-by-contact-action
existence.
The topic is generally credited to have begun with a 1935
paper by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR)—arguing,
essentially, that quantum mechanics (QM) could not be the end of
all theories. It has been the aim of the quantum physics
community as a whole, since, to ‘prove’ that QM is the end of all
theories. EPR made a sound argument, and the contrary arguments
are unsound. But, in my opinion, all seem to miss a key point.
The ‘QM is the end of all theories’ claim is not one about
physics, but about word problems. The claim is that a
quantum physics word problem can be solved only by the
mathematics of QM, and not by other methods—that other methods
will arrive at different results. This claim is false on
mathematical grounds. The problem is no longer
about physics at all. It is now purely mathematical, or
can be rephrased as being about red and white balls, boxes of
cookies, electronic oscillators, radio signals, etc. Only
mathematical considerations matter—and all mathematical methods,
applied to the same problem or an equivalent one, must arrive at
the same result. I have just proven without question that EPR
were correct.
In other words, ugly, ignorant prejudice has kept us from
investigating ‘quantum’ physics problems with the full repertoire of
mathematical techniques. There is, in fact, no such thing as
‘quantum’ physics: it is all just physics, some of which has falsely
been believed soluble only with QM. Though perhaps (and I think
probably) it is not by mere accident vast funds have been channeled
to ‘quantum’ physics research that might have gone to other
research. It is a neat racket when only you have the esoteric
but (supposedly) necessary tools for the job.
Furthermore, I have just proven that in papers, such as those of
John S. Bell and John Clauser, where classical physics is used to
try to solve problems previously solved with quantum mechanics, but
results are reached that are not the same as those of QM, there
must be mathematical errors. (I shall not belabor this
presentation with the hideous details.) Of course, reaching a result
different from that of QM was these authors’ goal! They sought
‘proof’ that ‘quantum’ physics cannot be explained by a more
conventional physics theory. They managed to prove only that the
physics community was ignorant of mathematics. It is impossible for
such a result to be correct. The papers should have been
unpublishable.
* * *
The physics community also is guilty of a profound dereliction of
one’s duty as a scientist: they have not applied scientific
method, and in fact hypothesize without making
observations. For, with the outstanding exception of a tiny few
(Kracklauer, de Raedt, etc.), they have not gone even to the minor
trouble of running computer programs or other experiments that would
produce the supposedly ‘quantum’ correlations by
contact-action. Never bothering to make observations before
concocting (and believing) wild hypotheses is gross
negligence for a field of science. However, my contributions below
are probably among the simplest and best computer programs for
producing ‘Bell correlations’ by contact-action, and included is a
tutorial on how to write and run such an experiment yourself, if you
can program a digital computer. Anyone denying the validity and
significance of such an experiment is jousting with reality.
* * *
Below are contributions to the topic by myself and others,
presenting their own authors’ opinions at the time of writing. I
include a celebrated lecture by John S. Bell—in which he violates
the definition of the conditional probability, incorrectly
implies that action-by-contact can be expressed only in the form
‘a causes b causes c causes d etc.’, and incorrectly solves even
the non-physics problems he contrives to illustrate his
reasoning.
-
Barry Schwartz,
Stern-Gerlach Shutters
-
- Internet, 2023
- There is presented, in the style of a homework problem
in an introductory physics textbook, a fully mechanical
analog of an EPR-Bohm experiment. The problem is solved
without quantum mechanics.
- Its author has released Stern-Gerlach Shutters
into the public domain.
-
Barry Schwartz, Problems logically equivalent to Bell
tests
-
- Internet, 2023
- A collection of word problems that are exactly or
nearly the same as Bell test experiments, except that they
have the subject matter changed. Making such changes is
Something-You-Should-Have-Come-to-Understand, even if it is
not Mathematics 101. (See also
C. J. Keyser, Mathematical Philosophy: A Study of Fate
and Freedom, and the writings of George Pólya.)
Such structure-preserving transformations demonstrate
directly that ‘irreducibility of quantum mechanics’,
‘entanglement’, ‘quantum non-locality’, and so on, are
superstitions resulting partly from mathematical
undereducation.
-
Barry Schwartz, How
to Entangle Craytons
-
- Internet, 2023
- A tutorial (in CWEB) on how to create a
quantum-entangled pair of variables on a non-quantum
computer. Actually sarcastic instructions on how to
write a small computer program that is a two-channel Bell
test kitchen-experiment. There is no quantum mechanics
involved. Also included is a stunningly simple derivation
of the correlation coefficient.
- The CWEB source code is How-to-Entangle-Craytons.w
- The latest revision may be obtained at
https://github.com/chemoelectric/How-to-Entangle-Craytons
-
Barry
Schwartz, Quantum Correlations Visualized
-
- Internet, 2023
- A Python program that helps the user visualize the
correlations of a two-channel Bell test experiment. That
the program is actually itself a Bell test experiment is
obscured until a person reads the source code. Otherwise
some who might otherwise download it would refuse to,
n’est-ce pas?
-
Barry Schwartz,
bell_test_classical_vs_entangled.adb
-
- Internet, 2023
- An Ada command-line program that directly compares
classical and ‘entangled’ simulations of a two-channel Bell
test experiment, for test angles requested by the user. The
simulations of course produce similar results. The nominal
values also are printed.
-
Donald A. Graft, Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the
quantum nonlocality debate
-
- Open Phys. 2017; 15:586–597
- doi:10.1515/phys-2017-0068
- Abstract.This paper argues that quantum
nonlocality (QNL) has not been rigorously proven, despite
the existence of recent Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB)
experiments that are claimed to be ‘loophole-free’. First,
readers are alerted to rhetorical arguments, which are
unfortunately often appealed to in the QNL debate, to
empower readers to identify and reject such arguments.
Second, logical problems in QNL proofs are described and
exemplified by a discussion of the projection postulate
problem. Third, experimental issues are described and
exemplified by a discussion of the postselection problem.
The paper concludes that QNL has not been proven and that
locality cannot be excluded.
-
A. F. Kracklauer,
Entanglement: a contrarian view.
-
- Journal of Modern Physics, 2015, 6, 1961–1968
- doi:10.4236/jmp.2015.613202
- Abstract. Entanglement is defined in terms of
some kind of instantaneous interaction, contrary to the
relativistic principle that all interaction is possible
only at a velocity less than that of light. This conflict
with an otherwise inviolate principle justifies
re-examination of the arguments leading to its (ostensible)
rejection. Herein the historically essential notion, namely
wave-collapse by measurement or the “Projection Hypothesis”
of von Neumann is brought to attention and seen to violate
Popper’s Principle of negatability; thereby disqualifying
it as a scientific proposition. Further, it is observed
that polarization of electromagnetic signals as used in
experiments testing Bell Inequalities is described by
structure excluding quantum principles. Consequently, most
experiments taken to verify Bell’s conclusions cannot in
principle do so: a quantum effect cannot be found where
there is no quantum structure. Finally, a simple simulation
which demonstrates the classical (electromagnetic)
generation of the data that violates a Bell Inequality,
thereby proving by counterexample that Bell’s so-called
theorem is misunderstood, is presented.
-
A.
F. Kracklauer, Bell’s “theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual
flaws.
-
- Open Phys. 2017; 15:754–761
- doi:10.1515/phys-2017-0088
- Abstract. An historical overview and detailed
explication of a critical analysis of what has become known
as Bell’s Theorem to the effect that, it should be
impossible to extend Quantum Theory with the addition of
local, real variables so as to obtain a version free of the
ambiguous and preternatural features of the currently
accepted interpretations is presented. The central point on
which this critical analysis, due originally to Edwin
Jaynes, is that Bell incorrectly applied probabilistic
formulas involving conditional probabilities. In addition,
mathematical technicalities that have complicated the
understanding of the logical or mathematical setting in
which current theory and experimentation are embedded, are
discussed. Finally, some historical speculations on the
sociological environment, in particular misleading aspects,
in which recent generations of physicists lived and worked
are mentioned.
-
J. S. Bell, Bertlmann’s
socks and the nature of reality.
-
- Preprint, CERN-TH-2926 (1980).
- https://cds.cern.ch/record/142461/
- This is a famous summary by Bell of his own
reasoning. It is an interesting exercise to find the
misapprehensions in his reasoning, not only in respect to
quantum physics, but also when he tries to sketch solutions
to other problems, such as heart attack rates.
Special Relativity without
paradoxes.
Perhaps the infamous ‘Twin Paradox’ is a result of confusing
different measurement sticks with each other, when applying
Special Relativity.
-
A.
F. Kracklauer, Time dilation contra Hamiltonian
mechanics.
-
- IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1251
(2019) 012026
- doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1251/1/012026
- Abstract. It is observed that, the introduction
of delayed electromagnetic interaction to account for the
finite speed of “light” (actually all electromagnetic
interaction) leads to different time variables where non
relativistic mechanics has only one. By carefully
identifying and taking these various times into account,
solutions are found for certain conundrums, including in
particular the twin of clock paradox. An important
consequence of this analysis is that it leads to a direct
generalization of mechanics including special relativistic
effects.
Fonts that you can use for anything, without
paying anything, and without first asking my permission, even for
any sort of commercial project.
Please do not ask permission, because it is already given.
Just take and enjoy!
-
Bonveno.
-
- Version: 1.1.2
- License: Expat
license.
- This was the first font I ever made, and was not meant
seriously. It is circular arcs, straight lines, etc.,
pasted together.
-
Fanwood, Fanwood
Text, and their italics.
-
-
Sorts Mill Goudy and
its italic.
-
-
Goudy
Bookletter 1911.
-
- Version: 2010.07.03
- License:
Public domain.
- Based on
Kennerley Old Style by
Frederic Goudy.
- I never made an italic, but nevertheless it is a
popular font. I used scans of an edition of Burton’s The
Book of the Thousand Nights and a Night as my main
specimen.
- Goudy Bookletter 1911 is also available as a Google
Font: [link].
-
Juvelo.
-
- Version: 1.0
- License:
Public domain.
- Based on Diethelm-Antiqua by Walter Diethelm.
- I believe this was the first digitization of
Diethelm-Antiqua, and it has a large collection of accented
glyphs, but it is quite rough, and I never finished an
italic. I used a translation of Schiller’s William
Tell, set by Walter Diethelm, as my main specimen.
-
Linden Hill
and its italic.
-
-
Prociono.
-
- Version: 2.3
- License:
Public domain.
- Prociono is also available as a Google Font:
[link].
Type specimens and other scans (on
Flickr).
Miscellaneous links.
This website, The Crud Factory, is the fault of Barry
Schwartz, who may be contacted as follows.
Image credit.
Typeface credit.